Min-Data UK

(BaMSoF) Burn A Koran Day

2010-09-09T10:28:24+00:00

A stupid idea [en.wikipedia.org]. Exactly as one would expect from religious people.

1. It’s not carbon neutral. They should pulp them (or similar) instead.

2. It’s dishonestly selective. They should be disposing of bibles and other such vile religious books as well. This is the most revealing part about the would-be perpetrators of the book-burning.

3. It doesn’t address the real problem - the evil humans all over the world who believe in these religions and who teach further generations of gullible humans to be evil too. The book is not magic.

4. It adds to the problem - giving the evil humans whose favoured book it is yet another excuse to be more evil (because, of course, they are pretending the book is magic too).

Comments: 0

(NatSci) coal tit

2010-09-08T11:33:43+00:00

The appearance of a coal tit on my bird feeder (ie just a couple of feet away from me!) the other day completes my set of tits. I have blue tits and great tits on it regularly and have recently had some rare visits from long-tailed tits. But I hadn’t had a sure sighting of a coal tit since I first moved here and thought I possibly saw one among the various tits moving between the trees. All other varieties of tit are far too unlikely to be expected in this area.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) woo-mongers

2010-09-08T08:31:19+00:00

Why the lying woo-mongers really ought to be held responsible for the consequences of their dishonesty - they cost lives and livelihoods [scienceblogs.com] (as well as causing much non-fatal physical injury and emotional harm and damage to property and progress). Recall that [Min-Data UK Blog], unfortunately, they can’t be held fully to account - on the grounds that, despite many examples to the contrary, people don’t expect people to be idiotic scum.

The purveyors of woo [campaign.r20.constantcontact.com] do seem to have some clue that they are in the wrong though. See how, for them, it’s all about covering up, hiding their naughtiness and hoping the problem goes away and nothing about any specific evidence to support their claims. Whereas, if they were honest (and competent and had a valid case) that page would instead be all about pointing their members at top quality scientific trials demonstrating the effectiveness of the therapy (of which there are none, of course, because it is no more than a dangerous placebo).

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) rabid proselytisers

2010-09-07T09:27:00+00:00

... whinge about other people [scienceblogs.com] not keeping their views to themselves!

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) conmen ...

2010-09-06T08:50:17+00:00

... of the more subtle sort [telegraph.co.uk]: the greedy, evil scum who get into positions of power where they pretend to be worth more than other people for actually doing very little and having little merit [chaosmatrix.org].

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) conmen ...

2010-09-05T08:40:39+00:00

... can be dangerous when opposed. Not only are they already known to be bad in their own right (or they wouldn’t be quacks, cranks and conmen!), but they tend to have fanatical followers (again of guaranteed poor judgment in at least one way!) and may also have hired flunkies/thugs to act on their behalf.

It seems that China is currently a rather dangerous place to visibly be a sceptic [blog.newhumanist.org.uk].

Comments: 0

(NatSci) apples

2010-09-04T12:29:34+00:00

Apple season is just about here. My tree, having started perhaps a month late this year, has mostly skipped the apple enlargement stage (despite receiving plenty of water and sun) but is heading towards applying colour and ripeness(?) anyway.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) madmen are ...

2010-09-04T12:25:15+00:00

... running loose in the community, instead of being detained and treated.

The US is possibly the most enthusiastic proponent of the psychobabbler. Yet they still let their dangerous loonies run around loose - and not just because the madmen are the ones with money, power, influence and religion. They even let the non-religious crazies get out of hand [scienceblogs.com]. But then they shoot them [scienceblogs.com] - because the US is also among the most enthusiastic proponents of gun usage in the world.

I would agree with some of his criticisms of the Discovery Channel [guardian.co.uk] and of society but, even without the more extreme elements of his grudge, he gets far too repetitive to be regarded as sane. Plus [google.com] one should never trust a guy who hero-worships Kirk (from StarTrek)!

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) criminals ...

2010-09-03T09:46:40+00:00

... photographing [telegraph.co.uk] themselves again. Such boastful stupidity [bbc.co.uk] really does make them far easier to find and convict. The police probably never have had much of a part to play in fighting crime compared with the contribution from people effectively outing themselves in various ways.

Then [guardian.co.uk] there are the criminal journalists [guardian.co.uk] ... who may be in league with enough of the criminally-minded people in power, in both the police and government, to avoid getting prosecuted. Sometimes the institutional incompetence is extremely selective and directed.

. . .

Updates on phone hacking: Grauniad [guardian.co.uk], BBC [bbc.co.uk], a blog [blog.indexoncensorship.org].

Mustn’t upset the police [guardian.co.uk] by investigating! Other dodgy answers [guardian.co.uk].

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) criminals ...

2010-09-02T08:28:16+00:00

... are still criminals. So it’s not really surprising [google.com] to find many of them acting [peoplemanagement.co.uk] that way [guardian.co.uk]. What it ought to mean for the offending individuals [bbc.co.uk], though, is immediate suspension of community service and resumption of a (longer) conventional prison sentence. It also ought to mean a black mark against the judgment of the person(s) who thought that particular offender was an appropriate choice for community service. Employ only the people who tend to get it right.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) Aug. 2010 spam

2010-09-01T10:00:43+00:00

Just 10 definitively spam emails for August (ie excluding notices from some organisations in which I merely wasn’t interested but needed to receive in case other instances were important). Most of those, 6 of them, were for the dkpanwar pest! Of the remaining 4, none were for sex drugs or dodgy watches.

1 was PayPal (and might even have been the real thing). 2 were from one annoying online trader (from whom I may once have bought something) and 1 was from another (from whom I definitely bought stuff). They are not endearing themselves to me by pestering me. If I ever want something again, I am quite capable of re-finding them by myself.

For some unknown reason, the 19th of August was a very popular day with these particular spammers. 4 of the 10 arrived on that day - 1 from each of them.

Comments: 0

(NatSci) August

2010-08-31T09:42:25+00:00

A wet and windy month. Allegedly that was still summer. It seemed more like monsoon season rolled into autumn.

Consequently, there wasn’t much in the way of frogs arrayed around the pond (as they tend to be on warm fly-filled days and evenings).

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) falling from the sky

2010-08-31T09:38:04+00:00

... it’s the landing [metro.co.uk], ie the stopping suddenly against a hard surface [bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk], which hurts [yorkshirepost.co.uk]. Rather a stupid [bbc.co.uk] recreational choice.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) nothing to do with us

2010-08-30T07:49:35+00:00

Meejah people behaving despicably [londonist.com]. What a surprise - not!

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) doing it rong

2010-08-29T08:54:08+00:00

Unsurprisingly, people [google.com] are still getting things completely wrong [bbc.co.uk] in their quest for "fair" education [guardian.co.uk]. People are not all equal. Not by a long way. The correct thing to do is to stream them all by ability, regardless of background and wealth (and religion!) instead of trying to mix the majority of them together, ruining the chances of nearly all of them, just to stop the semi-rich from trying to obtain a tiny measure of the privileges that the filthy rich have.

That’s not to say that the stupid pupils then get nothing spent on them though. Rather they should all have somewhere near the same rate of expenditure (it being hard to guarantee stuff down to the last penny!) but deployed more effectively to suit their particular needs to get the best possible out of each of them. The academic ones can race ahead in the basics without being held back and get to cover a wider range while fewer children leave school without being able to read and write etc at all.

Meanwhile [guardian.co.uk], cutting science funding is a ludicrously false economy.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) religious evil

2010-08-28T09:38:50+00:00

It’s not just the big atrocities committed by the religious because of their religion. It’s all the little every day abominations of the religiously retarded. Eg why you don’t want religious [bbc.co.uk] medical personnel managing your terminal health care [medicalnewstoday.com].

It’s interesting that someone at the Grauniad [guardian.co.uk] (who gets to write the official piece) doesn’t get it, while someone at a Christian rag [christiantoday.com] does. Of course there are also commenters at the Grauniad [guardian.co.uk] who do get it.

. . .

Meanwhile [express.co.uk], so much for one bad-attitude [bbc.co.uk] place as a "care" home [mirror.co.uk].

Comments: 0

(NatSci) fat froglet

2010-08-27T15:46:09+00:00

Today’s offering of amphibian(s) from the cellar, after a few days of near continuous deluge, was just one small but wonderfully plump froglet. Since its tail was all gone, perhaps I should start thinking of it as a frog now.

It must have been one of this year’s early pond leavers and then been very busy/greedy all summer eating everything it met in the undergrowth. I think it’s too small to have been one of last year’s late developers.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) how you say?

2010-08-27T08:54:04+00:00

From the sign-up info on the sing-up website, ie a bunch of people aiming to help educate children:

Quote:
It is really important that you register in the right role, as otherwise you might be able to access what you need in order to teach.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) stupid humans

2010-08-26T08:36:57+00:00

Humans are not really getting significantly smarter. Collectively and theoretically, more stuff (and very important stuff at that!) is known than ever before. However, individual humans [guardian.co.uk] mostly neither recall it [telegraph.co.uk] in practice [google.com] nor act [metro.co.uk] intelligently on it.

And in some places where the leadership is particularly religiously retarded, they are even progressing backwards [guardian.co.uk] on their ability to gather further reliable information.

Comments: 0

(BaMSoF) traffic surfing

2010-08-25T08:47:24+00:00

Have they been watching [google.com] too many stupid teen [doncasterfreepress.co.uk] movies?

Comments: 0