<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://blog.min-data.co.uk/feed/feed.css" type="text/css"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Min-Data UK</title>
    <link>http://www.min-data.co.uk/</link>
    <description>Min-Data UK Blogs</description>
    
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9620</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>Today, Google is playing silly games with dropping &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/newton10-apple.png&apos; title=&apos;an apple&apos;&gt;an apple&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] from &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/newton10-tree.jpg&apos; title=&apos;a tree branch in its logo&apos;&gt;a tree branch in its logo&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] (to celebrate Isaac Newton).</description>
      <dc:date>2010-01-04T12:14:39+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9619</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>I don&apos;t know what it&apos;s about but &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/d4gwinner09_uk-hp.gif&apos; title=&apos;it&amp;#039;s pretty&apos;&gt;it&apos;s pretty&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk].</description>
      <dc:date>2009-12-18T11:48:02+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9618</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>By the light of the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/wateronmoon09-hp.gif&apos; title=&apos;watery moon&apos;&gt;watery moon&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] ...</description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-14T18:59:51+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9617</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>Yay - &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/wallaceandgromit09.gif&apos; title=&apos;Wallace and Gromit&apos;&gt;Wallace and Gromit&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk]!</description>
      <dc:date>2009-11-04T11:58:28+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9616</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>&lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/orsted09.gif&apos; title=&apos;Another sciencey one&apos;&gt;Another sciencey one&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk].</description>
      <dc:date>2009-08-14T10:20:49+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9615</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>Another nice one - &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/perseids09.gif&apos; title=&apos;the perseid meteor shower&apos;&gt;the perseid meteor shower&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk].</description>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T12:56:51+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9614</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>Yay - &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/moonlanding09.gif&apos; title=&apos;lunar landing&apos;&gt;lunar landing&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk]!</description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-21T08:22:52+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9613</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>&lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/tesla09.gif&apos; title=&apos;Science with (almost obligatory) lightning effects!&apos;&gt;Science with (almost obligatory) lightning effects!&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk]</description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-10T08:30:27+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(Min-Data) &quot;Emoticons and the input forms&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9612</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?852</link>
      <description>A few more (a couple very delayed) in Y13: &lt;span style=&apos;font-weight: bold;&apos;&gt;fairyV&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style=&apos;font-weight: bold;&apos;&gt;telepath&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style=&apos;font-weight: bold;&apos;&gt;plumber&lt;/span&gt; (or dalek impersonator!) and &lt;span style=&apos;font-weight: bold;&apos;&gt;fishing&lt;/span&gt; (also multi-purpose).</description>
      <dc:date>2009-07-06T17:21:06+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9611</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>&lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/stravinsky09.gif&apos; title=&apos;Stravinsky&amp;#039;s Firebird&apos;&gt;Stravinsky&apos;s Firebird&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk]</description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-17T10:47:43+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9610</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>PS and the &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.com/logos/tetris09_res.gif&apos; title=&apos;little one&apos;&gt;little one&lt;/a&gt; [google.com].</description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-06T08:27:59+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9609</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>It&apos;s gone all &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/tetris09.gif&apos; title=&apos;tetris&apos;&gt;tetris&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] at us - making it harder to read than it need have been.</description>
      <dc:date>2009-06-06T08:00:47+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9608</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>A nice &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/missinglink.gif&apos; title=&apos;google tribute&apos;&gt;google tribute&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] to the primate fossil, apart from inappropriately calling it &quot;missing link&quot; (as per the ridiculous over-hype from the media and a few dodgy scientists).</description>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T07:40:02+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(NatSci) &quot;themed advert&quot; - Comment by kattwild - ID: 9607</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1189</link>
      <description>Dear SEF,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;      I have recently updated the t-shirt pages and added lots of new science shirts. I also have many ladybird items. Let me know your sweatshirt size and I can check for shirts that might not be mentioned on the site.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;Kathy</description>
      <dc:date>2009-05-12T16:06:25+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9606</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>&lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/stgeorge09.gif&apos; title=&apos;Wooing a dragon&apos;&gt;Wooing a dragon&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] is much better than fighting it.</description>
      <dc:date>2009-04-23T08:05:36+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(MiscArts) &quot;Google logos&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9605</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?1812</link>
      <description>The 2009 &lt;a href=&apos;http://www.google.co.uk/logos/earthday09.gif&apos; title=&apos;earth-day&apos;&gt;earth-day&lt;/a&gt; [google.co.uk] one is nice too.</description>
      <dc:date>2009-04-22T12:07:10+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(BaMSoF) &quot;idiots of the week&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9604</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?3569</link>
      <description>I&apos;d say it was definitely in the running for worst BBC programme &quot;evah&quot; - of the ones I&apos;ve had the misfortune to come across, anyway. I don&apos;t generally listen to any radio nor watch the stuff which is pre-labelled as being religious tat and hence guaranteed to be full of lies. So it could conceivably be further down the list of the BBC&apos;s sins than I&apos;m guessing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One problem is that there isn&apos;t a law against that reverse-defamation type of disinformation, ie telling flattering falsehoods (though I think there should be), and the modern BBC has apparently seldom regarded its remit (to inform rather than mis-inform and to educate rather than mis-educate) as being particularly binding. They also only have the slenderest grasp of the &quot;to entertain&quot; component, despite that being the only thing which genuinely seems to matter to them at all in their misguided ratings-chasing game.</description>
      <dc:date>2009-04-18T01:52:50+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(BaMSoF) &quot;idiots of the week&quot; - Comment by rasmusfribble - ID: 9603</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?3569</link>
      <description>Worst of all was the whole misguided quote along the lines of &quot;Science doesn&apos;t claim to explain the big questions such as &apos;Where did we come from?&apos; or &apos;Why are we here?&apos; ... Therefore religion must be right.&quot; It takes some doing to distract me from a puzzle but this certainly managed it.</description>
      <dc:date>2009-04-17T17:54:12+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(BaMSoF) &quot;idiots of the week&quot; - Comment by rasmusfribble - ID: 9602</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?3569</link>
      <description>I saw the C.S. Lewis programme (although only half-watching it as I was doing a puzzle at the time). I loved the way the first half was hype, then they quickly explained the link with the planets, then they went &quot;right, to hell with C.S. Lewis, here&apos;s some theology&quot;. The arguments were quite flaky at best.</description>
      <dc:date>2009-04-17T17:49:33+01:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>(BaMSoF) &quot;Introduction&quot; - Comment by SEF - ID: 9601</title>
      <link>http://blog.min-data.co.uk/redr/?931</link>
      <description>&lt;a href=&apos;http://www.robsherman.com/advocacy/060401a.htm&apos; title=&apos;An old one&apos;&gt;An old one&lt;/a&gt; [robsherman.com] - damning rather than funny as such:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class=&apos;md_quote&apos;&gt;Quote from &lt;span style=&apos;font-style: italic;&apos;&gt;George W.Bush&lt;/span&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&apos;t know that atheists should be regarded as citizens, nor should they be regarded as patriotic.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2009-01-11T10:51:02+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
